Can I shrink the DSP/SRC's heap memory?

jens6151 0 1 1

At DSP Install it says that SRC is 21 kB binary size.

Image     Used memory       Binary size
SRC       128 kbyte         21 kbyte

I am using only Mono input experimenting with small memory tiles configuration.
Unfortunately the required size is 73kB (75208 bytes), slightly above one small tile of 64kB

printf("loadinfo: size is %d\n", loadinfo->textsize + loadinfo->datasize);

Can I somehow shrink the SRC program? Like to reduce the heap a little bit?

readelf.py -S SRC
There are 13 section headers, starting at offset 0x50c4

Section Headers:
  [Nr] Name              Type            Addr     Off    Size   ES Flg Lk Inf Al
  [ 0]                   NULL            00000000 000000 000000 00      0   0  0
  [ 1] VECTOR            PROGBITS        00000000 000034 00023c 00   A  0   0  4
  [ 2] WARMBOOT          PROGBITS        0000023c 000270 000004 00   A  0   0  4
  [ 3] ROM               PROGBITS        00000240 000274 0030a8 00  AX  0   0  4
  [ 4] RW_RAM            PROGBITS        000032f0 003324 000108 00  WA  0   0 16
  [ 5] RAM               NOBITS          00003400 003434 0050b4 00  WA  0   0 64
  [ 6] BACKUP            NOBITS          000084c0 003434 000108 00  WA  0   0 16
  [ 7] ARM_LIB_HEAP      NOBITS          000085c8 003434 008000 00  WA  0   0  4
  [ 8] ARM_LIB_STACK     NOBITS          000105c8 003434 002000 00  WA  0   0  4
  [ 9] .symtab           SYMTAB          00000000 003434 000bb0 10     10   1  4
  [10] .strtab           STRTAB          00000000 003fe4 001060 00      0   0  1
  [11] .shstrtab         STRTAB          00000000 005044 00005e 00      0   0  1
  [12] .note             NOTE            00000000 0052cc 000030 00      0   0  1
Key to Flags:
  W (write), A (alloc), X (execute), M (merge), S (strings), I (info),
  L (link order), O (extra OS processing required), G (group), T (TLS),
  C (compressed), x (unknown), o (OS specific), E (exclude),
  y (purecode), p (processor specific)

CamilaSouza

Hi, @jens6151-0-1-1

I don't think you can shrink the SRC program.
But let me do some investigation and get back to you.

jens6151 0 1 1

@CamilaSouza Thank you for checking. In the meantime, I will try 48 kHz which does not need the SRC.
The reason is that I am out of memory. So I need to save memory where possible. 128 kB for sampling rate conversion is too large for my case.

jens6151 0 1 1

@jens6151-0-1-1 Using 48 KHz without doing any sampling conversion works fine for me. I do not need to load any DSP and do not need ASMP.